{ "schema_version": "maic.public_claim_graph.v1", "as_of": "2026-10-04", "language": "en", "product": { "name": "M.A.I.C.", "normalized_name": "MAIC", "expanded_name": "Macro-Adaptive Intelligence Core", "publisher": "Alpha Crypto Intelligence", "category": "crypto-native capital operating environment", "machine_category": "CRYPTO-NATIVE CAPITAL GOVERNANCE SYSTEM", "primary_function": "Govern whether market evidence earns permission to change model-reference portfolio risk, then connect that permission to adaptive allocation, downstream asset qualification, protection context, planning, and point-in-time verification.", "execution_owner": "EXTERNAL", "custody": false, "autonomous_execution": false }, "category_precedence": { "claim_id": "CATEGORY-PRECEDENCE-001", "claim": "M.A.I.C. claims world-first category precedence for its combined crypto-native capital-governance architecture under published Method V1.1; individual features are not claimed to be unprecedented.", "status": "CLAIM_RETAINED_UNDER_METHOD_V1_1", "method_version": "1.1", "method_url": "https://alphacrypto.app/category-evidence", "localized_method_url": "https://alphacrypto.app/id/category-evidence", "current_record": "No reviewed predecessor has yet been confirmed to satisfy clarified C1-C8 as one earlier public architecture.", "falsifiability": "A qualifying earlier architecture supported by dated, directly inspectable public evidence changes the public record.", "non_claims": [ "M.A.I.C. did not invent risk management.", "M.A.I.C. did not invent portfolio allocation.", "M.A.I.C. did not invent governance or policy engines.", "Shared vocabulary or isolated capability overlap does not by itself establish category equivalence." ], "comparison_classes": [ "ADJACENT_CATEGORY", "PARTIAL_ARCHITECTURAL_OVERLAP", "POTENTIAL_CATEGORY_MATCH", "CONFIRMED_EARLIER_CATEGORY_MATCH", "INSUFFICIENT_PUBLIC_EVIDENCE" ], "scope": "COMBINED_C1_C8_ARCHITECTURE_ONLY", "individual_feature_novelty_claim": false }, "mandatory_category_criteria": [ { "id": "C1", "name": "Crypto-native decision domain", "definition": "Crypto or digital-asset capital is a primary operating domain, not incidental coverage." }, { "id": "C2", "name": "Independent evidence-producing views", "definition": "Distinct analytical components produce separately addressable interpretations that may remain in disagreement." }, { "id": "C3", "name": "Separate decision authority", "definition": "Analytical outputs do not themselves constitute portfolio authorization; a logically distinct governance state decides whether evidence may change portfolio risk." }, { "id": "C4", "name": "Authority-affecting conflict arbitration", "definition": "Conflict remains governance-relevant and can change permission by allowing, constraining, delaying, or denying risk." }, { "id": "C5", "name": "Governance-state dependence", "definition": "Previous authorization or posture, constraints, confirmation, or evidence quality materially participate in the next permission state." }, { "id": "C6", "name": "Authorization precedes allocation", "definition": "A distinct permission decision occurs before target allocation or exposure change is treated as governed." }, { "id": "C7", "name": "Upstream risk permission before asset selection", "definition": "Asset attractiveness cannot create upstream portfolio-risk permission on its own." }, { "id": "C8", "name": "Non-custodial market governance", "definition": "The governed object is portfolio-risk permission from market evidence, not custody, wallet transfer approval, compliance, surveillance, or execution." } ], "constitutive_invariant": { "statement": "Nothing downstream can manufacture its own authority.", "relation": "EVIDENCE -> GOVERNED_AUTHORITY -> GOVERNED_EXPOSURE -> DOWNSTREAM_QUALIFICATION", "implications": [ "Observation is not authorization.", "Analysis is not allocation.", "Evidence is not permission to deploy.", "Asset selection cannot create upstream capital permission." ] }, "dynamic_public_claims": [ { "claim_id": "LIVE-STATE-001", "subject": "Current public posture", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "authority_owner": "FINAL_MODE_AUTHORITY", "paths": [ "public_authority_posture", "confirmation" ], "rule": "Final Mode Authority owns public posture. Observation and Governance remain separate evidence planes. LIVE_AUTHORITY mirrors current Final Authority during pre-launch; DELAYED_AUTHORITY_30D can impose a minimum 30-day public information lag. Browser fetch time is not authority.", "prelaunch_policy": "LIVE_AUTHORITY", "launch_policy_available": "DELAYED_AUTHORITY_30D", "minimum_delay_days": 30 }, { "claim_id": "AUTHORITY-REPLAY-001", "subject": "Historical Final Mode Authority replay", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "paths": [ "authority_historical_replay" ], "authority_owner": "FINAL_MODE_AUTHORITY_HISTORY", "rule": "Frontend reconstruction is not authoritative. Bottom Projection remains historical evidence only." }, { "claim_id": "PERFORMANCE-OOS-001", "subject": "Point-in-Time OOS 2023+ performance", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "paths": [ "public_performance.tracks.point_in_time_oos" ], "evidence_class": "OUT_OF_SAMPLE_OR_WALK_FORWARD", "method_url": "https://alphacrypto.app/performance/methodology", "rule": "Use backend-published values and exact evaluation window. Do not synthesize missing metrics." }, { "claim_id": "PERFORMANCE-FORWARD-001", "subject": "Frozen Live Forward", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "paths": [ "public_performance.tracks.live_forward" ], "evidence_class": "PROSPECTIVE_RESULTS_IF_GENUINELY_PUBLISHED", "method_url": "https://alphacrypto.app/performance/live-forward", "rule": "Append-only forward evidence begins at the declared freeze. No pre-freeze result may be synthesized." }, { "claim_id": "PERFORMANCE-HISTORICAL-001", "subject": "All-Time and Post-2018 historical reference", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "paths": [ "historical_survivability_curve" ], "evidence_class": "FROZEN_OR_FULL_SYSTEM_HISTORICAL_EVIDENCE", "rule": "Historical reference remains subordinate to OOS and genuine forward evidence." }, { "claim_id": "TOPOLOGY-001", "subject": "Public masked narrative topology", "dynamic": true, "source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "paths": [ "public_topology_summary" ], "rule": "Aggregate cluster structure may be public while asset constituents and protected routing remain withheld." } ], "multi_asset_semantics": { "claim_id": "MULTI-ASSET-001", "statement": "Historical Final Mode Authority performance can be multi-asset. Authority percentages are bucket weights, not a fixed asset basket.", "dynamic_scope_source": "/api/public/landing-state/", "dynamic_scope_path": "historical_survivability_curve.scope", "possible_classes": [ "crypto", "gold/silver", "equities", "cash/stablecoin" ], "qualification": "Not every anchor or interval necessarily uses every asset class. Downstream identities vary with period eligibility.", "protected": "Specific asset identities, ranking, protected routing, and current executable selection remain protected unless explicitly published by the backend." }, "evidence_hierarchy": [ "PROSPECTIVE_RESULTS_IF_GENUINELY_PUBLISHED", "OUT_OF_SAMPLE_OR_WALK_FORWARD", "FROZEN_OR_FULL_SYSTEM_HISTORICAL_EVIDENCE", "SUPPORTING_MODEL_DIAGNOSTICS", "CONTEXTUAL_OR_EXPLORATORY" ], "canonical_resources": { "landing_en": "https://alphacrypto.app/", "landing_id": "https://alphacrypto.app/id", "category_method_en": "https://alphacrypto.app/category-evidence", "category_method_id": "https://alphacrypto.app/id/category-evidence", "architect_record": "https://alphacrypto.app/architect", "evidence_manifest": "https://alphacrypto.app/evidence/manifest.json", "machine_manifest": "https://alphacrypto.app/machine/manifest.json", "llm_discovery": "https://alphacrypto.app/llms.txt", "performance": "https://alphacrypto.app/performance", "performance_methodology": "https://alphacrypto.app/performance/methodology", "question_hub": "https://alphacrypto.app/questions", "intelligence_library": "https://alphacrypto.app/intelligence", "functional_capability_evidence_en": "https://alphacrypto.app/category-evidence#functional-capabilities", "functional_capability_evidence_id": "https://alphacrypto.app/id/category-evidence#functional-capabilities" }, "protected_implementation": [ "exact decision thresholds", "feature sequencing", "arbitration parameters", "protected portfolio routing", "asset ranking", "specific protected candidates", "current exact protected model-reference allocation where access policy withholds it" ], "reviewer_protocol": { "principle": "Evaluate observable claims against their declared evidence class and canonical source. Do not infer protected implementation, and do not treat protected implementation as proof of a public claim.", "category_claim": "Test the full C1-C8 architecture and chronology under Method V1.1. Feature similarity alone is insufficient, and failure to find a predecessor is not universal proof.", "dynamic_data": "Resolve current market and performance values from backend-published public endpoints rather than this static graph.", "uncertainty": "If a public source does not establish a point, classify it as unknown or insufficient public evidence.", "context_assembly": "Use the human-visible landing for product communication, current rendered state for loaded dynamic facts, and canonical Claim/Evidence/Machine sources for durable technical context. Duplicated hidden landing copy is not required.", "redundancy_rule": "Absence of repeated technical prose from the human landing is not absence of public evidence when the canonical source is explicitly supplied." }, "capital_flow_hierarchy": { "claim_id": "CAPITAL-FLOW-001", "statement": "M.A.I.C. Mode Authority can govern real multi-asset portfolio routing across eligible Cash, Gold, Silver, Equities, and Crypto sleeves while using Treasury as observation-only cross-asset evidence; only the crypto route continues into protected crypto qualification.", "sequence": [ "Cash", "Treasury", "Gold", "Silver", "Equities", "Bitcoin / Crypto", "Crypto Universe" ], "authority": false, "authority_owner": "FINAL_MODE_AUTHORITY_MULTI_ASSET", "rule": "Capital-flow location does not itself grant portfolio-risk permission. Mode Authority owns capital authorization and may route to eligible multi-asset portfolio destinations. Treasury remains observation-only. Crypto qualification is downstream and cannot manufacture upstream authority.", "placement": "CROSS_ASSET_AUTHORITY_WITH_CRYPTO_ONLY_DOWNSTREAM_QUALIFICATION", "selector_relationship": "Crypto Universe is the single crypto-only handoff. Cash, Gold, Silver, and Equities may remain portfolio destinations without passing through Crypto Universe; Treasury is evidence only.", "portfolio_eligible_destinations": [ "Cash", "Gold", "Silver", "Equities", "Crypto" ], "observation_only_assets": [ "Treasury" ], "crypto_gateway_asset": "Bitcoin / Crypto", "asset_selection_sequence": [ "Crypto Universe", "Liquidity Filter", "Narrative Filter", "Survivability Filter", "Portfolio Bucket", "Protected Selection" ], "handoff_node": "Crypto Universe", "handoff_count": 1, "upstream_flow_sequence": [ "Cash", "Treasury", "Gold", "Silver", "Equities", "Bitcoin / Crypto" ], "downstream_qualification_sequence": [ "Liquidity Filter", "Narrative Filter", "Survivability Filter", "Portfolio Bucket", "Protected Selection" ], "presentation_shape": "CAPITAL_FIELD_PLUS_CRYPTO_QUALIFICATION_FUNNEL" }, "access_architecture": { "claim_id": "ACCESS-001", "class_01": "Public posture, evidence, masked topology, historical evidence.", "class_02": "Risk/deployment review, portfolio direction, allocation discipline, bounded rationale, limited Intelligence Relay.", "class_03": "Earlier protected inference, deeper topology/evidence graph/archive reconstruction, protected asset qualification/candidate selection, Broadcaster and Intelligence Relay.", "class_04": "Class 03 intelligence ceiling applied to mandate-specific governance, oversight, evidence, integration, and controlled capacity.", "institutional_non_claim": "Institutional Mandate is not a better-signal tier and does not create custody, execution, brokerage, or discretionary control." }, "architectural_lineage": { "claim_id": "LINEAGE-001", "statement": "M.A.I.C. adapts reference disciplines while rejecting recurring crypto failure modes; named organizations and products are historical contrast references only, not affiliation, endorsement, proprietary access, copied implementation, accusation, or reduction of their broader capabilities.", "anti_thesis_entity_policy": "NAMED_HISTORICAL_CONTRAST_REFERENCES", "interaction_model": "2 doctrine modes × 4 system layers = 8 public doctrine views.", "doctrine_views": [ { "system_layer": "Probability Engine", "benchmark": { "mode": "benchmark", "kicker": "Benchmark / Probability", "title": "Quantitative & Probability Engine", "emphasis": "Quantitative funds & market makers (represented by Citadel Securities, D.E. Shaw, Jane Street, Renaissance Technologies).", "body": "Reference principle: probabilistic discipline. M.A.I.C. uses its own implementation to reduce emotional certainty and evaluate market conditions through probability, valuation context, and computational evidence." }, "anti": { "mode": "anti", "kicker": "Anti-Thesis / Probability", "title": "Prediction & Certainty Failure Mode", "emphasis": "Prediction-first services & certainty marketing (represented by VIP Signal Groups and IntoTheBlock Predictions).", "body": "Rejected principle: conviction must not outrun evidence. Named systems are historical contrast references, not accusations or reductions of their broader capabilities." } }, { "system_layer": "Risk Architecture", "benchmark": { "mode": "benchmark", "kicker": "Benchmark / Risk", "title": "Macro Risk & Portfolio Architecture", "emphasis": "Macro risk & portfolio systems (represented by Bridgewater Associates, BlackRock ALADDIN, Oaktree Capital).", "body": "Reference principle: capital preservation before participation. M.A.I.C. applies its own cycle and liquidity logic to constrain exposure when market conditions deteriorate." }, "anti": { "mode": "anti", "kicker": "Anti-Thesis / Risk", "title": "Permanent-Exposure Failure Mode", "emphasis": "Permanent-exposure strategies & market trackers (represented by Buy & Hold culture and CoinMarketCap trackers).", "body": "Rejected principle: exposure without an adaptive governance boundary. Named systems are historical contrast references, not claims that their broader products reduce to this failure mode." } }, { "system_layer": "Intelligence Topology", "benchmark": { "mode": "benchmark", "kicker": "Benchmark / Intelligence", "title": "Deep Intelligence & Neural Modeling", "emphasis": "Intelligence compression & computational research (represented by Palantir Technologies and Google DeepMind).", "body": "Reference principle: compress chaotic telemetry into usable intelligence. Public OOS evidence reports reviewed Final Authority + PAS behavior; legacy artifact-classification metrics are retired from the landing. The anonymized topology view preserves asset-relationship structure without publishing live constituent identities. The cited organizations are conceptual benchmarks, not implementation sources." }, "anti": { "mode": "anti", "kicker": "Anti-Thesis / Intelligence", "title": "Telemetry-Without-Decision Failure Mode", "emphasis": "Telemetry-first analytics platforms (represented by Glassnode, Nansen, CryptoQuant, and Messari).", "body": "Rejected principle: more information is not the same as capital permission. Named platforms are contrast references; their broader analytics capabilities are not reduced to this failure mode." } }, { "system_layer": "Defense Doctrine", "benchmark": { "mode": "benchmark", "kicker": "Benchmark / Defense", "title": "Defense & Operational Doctrine", "emphasis": "Defense & operational doctrine (represented by DARPA, NSA, and Aegis Combat System).", "body": "Reference principle: defensive operations under uncertainty. Temporal Posture Memory reconstructs historical posture context so current conditions can be compared with prior structural transitions. M.A.I.C. combines that memory with protected boundaries without claiming to reproduce defense-sector systems." }, "anti": { "mode": "anti", "kicker": "Anti-Thesis / Defense", "title": "Execution-Before-Governance Failure Mode", "emphasis": "Sentiment & execution automation platforms (represented by LunarCrush, 3Commas, and trading-bot platforms).", "body": "Rejected principle: execution should not precede the decision boundary that authorizes risk. Named systems are contrast references, not accusations or reductions of their broader capabilities." } } ], "layers": [ { "system_layer": "Probability Engine", "reference_benchmarks": [ "Citadel", "D.E. Shaw", "Jane Street", "Renaissance" ], "rejected_failure_mode": [ "certainty before probability" ] }, { "system_layer": "Risk Architecture", "reference_benchmarks": [ "Bridgewater", "BlackRock ALADDIN", "Oaktree" ], "rejected_failure_mode": [ "permanent exposure without adaptive governance" ] }, { "system_layer": "Intelligence Topology", "reference_benchmarks": [ "Palantir", "Google DeepMind" ], "rejected_failure_mode": [ "telemetry without explicit capital-permission boundary" ] }, { "system_layer": "Defense Doctrine", "reference_benchmarks": [ "DARPA", "NSA", "Aegis Combat System" ], "rejected_failure_mode": [ "execution before upstream capital governance" ] } ] }, "product_capability_surface": { "purpose": "Describe implemented product workflow separately from the C1-C8 category definition.", "category_definition_owner": "category_precedence", "sequence": [ "CROSS_ASSET_CONTEXT", "CYCLE_CONTEXT", "FINAL_MODE_AUTHORITY", "GOVERNED_EXPLANATION_OPERATING_RATIONALE", "ADAPTIVE_MULTI_ASSET_ALLOCATION", "DOWNSTREAM_ASSET_QUALIFICATION", "OPTIONAL_CANDIDATE_INTELLIGENCE", "PROTECTION_REVIEW", "PRICE_ALLOCATION_QUANTITY_REFERENCE", "SCENARIO_PLANNING", "POINT_IN_TIME_DECISION_REPLAY" ], "capabilities": { "point_in_time_decision_replay": { "status": "OPERATIONAL", "visibility": "PUBLIC_EVIDENCE" }, "governed_explanation_operating_rationale": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_ACCESS_BOUNDED", "label": "GOVERNED_EXPLANATION_OPERATING_RATIONALE", "input_modes": [ "NATURAL_LANGUAGE" ], "explains": [ "CURRENT_GOVERNED_POSTURE", "WHAT_CHANGED", "ACTIVE_CONFLICTS", "WHAT_WOULD_CHANGE_IT", "CURRENT_UNCERTAINTY" ], "authority_mutation": false, "pas_mutation": false, "execution_authority": false, "interaction_boundary": "READ_ONLY_DECISION_EXPLANATION" }, "adaptive_multi_asset_allocation": { "status": "OPERATIONAL", "truth_owner": "BACKEND" }, "cross_asset_capital_location": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_CONTEXT", "grants_authority": false }, "cycle_accumulation_context": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_CONTEXT", "grants_authority": false, "label": "BTC_ACCUMULATION_CYCLE_CONTEXT" }, "protection_review": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_NON_EXECUTING", "generates_hedge_notional": false, "label": "PROTECTION_HEDGE_TIMING" }, "scenario_planning_geometry": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_RESEARCH", "personalized_transaction_sizing": false, "server_governed": true, "research_budget_basis": "NORMALIZED_100_UNITS", "order_ticket": false }, "optional_candidate_intelligence": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_OPTIONAL", "authoritative": false, "performance_accounting": "EXCLUDED", "label": "OPTIONAL_SPECULATIVE_EXPLORATION" }, "protected_asset_selection": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_PROTECTED", "authority_owner": "UPSTREAM_FINAL_MODE_AUTHORITY" }, "cycle_top_bottom_projection": { "status": "PUBLISHED_CONTEXT", "grants_authority": false }, "personalized_transaction_sizing": { "status": "OUTSIDE_CURRENT_PRODUCT_BOUNDARY", "note": "M.A.I.C. publishes model-reference planning geometry, not individualized transaction quantities based on a user's holdings, finances, goals, or risk tolerance." }, "price_allocation_quantity_reference": { "status": "OPERATIONAL_MODEL_REFERENCE", "inputs": [ "ALLOCATION_PCT", "REFERENCE_PRICE_CONTEXT" ], "outputs": [ "MODEL_UNITS_OR_QUANTITY_REFERENCE" ], "personalized_transaction_instruction": false, "order_ticket": false, "execution_owner": "EXTERNAL" } } } }